Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Anti-Rape Device My Sweet *cough*

March 22nd 2007 10:32
I hate feminist activists, they have no idea what they are going on about, ever. They claim they want equal treatment but are so vague on the terms they themselves don’t know how to say it equal or not.

So one particularly resourceful devil woman (I shall call her that) has invented an ‘anti-rape’ device. Of course in her little ideal world men are idiots and they won’t look before diving in deep.

A south African who isn’t exactly African in appearance but more Caucasian invented the device, her name is Sonette Ehlers, her devices name is the 'Rapex' (what a cool name eh?).


It is inserted into the (probably white) woman’s vagina who feels ‘at risk’ (oh so wonderful, got a soap opera now too?) so she can happily prance around in back alley’s and other such places. Enter serial rapist evil black man Mr. X, Mr. X finds this pretty white innocent white woman and since he is inherently evil tries to rape her.

Anti-Rape Device
Oh You're So Clever and I'm So Dumb


Puts his wingdingling into her and then guess what? The device that is inside her attaches onto him and he feels a massive amount of pain as the needles burrow into his member. He has to go to a doctor who can only remove it via surgery who will then notify the police.

Evil black man goes to prison, pretty innocent white woman is saved.

Of course that’s the ideal world from the views of an idiot feminist.


In the real world the man will take the device out of her vagina, slap the shit out of her, rape her (maybe not in that order) and tell her she can take her anti-rape device and shove it, literally.

It's really stupid, she claims 'It will make the men think twice', yeah darn right it will, they'll double check if theres anything inside her first and if there is I can guarantee to you he's going to hate her that much more and probably even kill her, I can already picture this man taking this 'anti-rape' device and lodging it inside out in the womans vagina. I'm not even a sadistic murder/rapist and thats what I'm thinking they will do, of course all men are like that in your little world.

I’m not defending Mr. X here, I’m speaking of just what an idiot that woman is, she’s so thin and stupid, and her obvious (of course non-admitted) hatred of men is clear as day here.

Oh, but it doesn't end there, Lisa Vetten from the Centre for Violence and Reconciliation said that once again it was up to women to protect themselves from the evil rapist man, and when asked if such a device is better than nothing she grundingly said "Why don't we all strap little shock devices onto men - wouldn't that help? But could you imagine the outcry?".

Dear stupid woman, if you try to pull that one off it will be so obvious that you just hate men that you will cause both males and females to unite in personally destroying your character. Perhaps we can just re-apply that and say 'why don't we just stitch womens vagina's up?' or 'why don't we just fill it with cement?', you know why, because it's stupid, like you.

Of course if I suggest the death penalty for rape I’m seen as a cold blooded killer by the same feminist women, so what do I know? They can have their female condom and run around under the false impression of safety.
128
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
20 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Filmpeeker

March 22nd 2007 11:24
Go get them tiger!

You seem to have a bit too much knowledge on how a rapist acts...

How comfortable can it be for a woman?? What's next? A wingdingling-guillotine?

So long,

filmpeeker

Comment by Ahmed

March 22nd 2007 11:28
You can attribute that to my many, many years of... watching law and order and SVU.

Amazing how I came up with half that stuff, I guess the difference between a rapist and a normal person (like me) is that I don't rape people... Of course you can try telling that to those feminists...

Comment by Brenton

March 22nd 2007 12:28
I can see the use in areas with high incidence of rape, potentially.

I don't think the majority of rapist would look for it

But there's A LOT to be considered, as Ahmed sadi.

Comment by Ahmed

March 22nd 2007 12:36
Maybe not at first but after three or four are caught I think everyone will start looking for them, including boyfriends and husbands who are slightly suspicious of their significant others... but thats another story


Another problem which I haven't brought up is the law, while it is allowable for women to have that placed inside them (as a means of self defense) the man does have a patient/doctor confidentiality that is I eblieve on null'd and voided when the doctor is treating a gun wound of sorts.

At the end of the day it's bullshit, it won't stop rapists by and large and those who will 'think twice' will be thinking about checking if she has one inside her, not thinking about not doing it because she has one inside her.

Of course Lisa is also a crazy deranged woman, the kind who thinks all men are evil and something or another, she's probably the only supporter of Sonette which goes to show just how credible they are.

I don't like rape, far from it, I think it deserves capital punishment however to that end I don't see this as being any means to stop rape, heck, even worse, just wait and see.

Comment by yoda76

March 22nd 2007 20:07
the man does have a patient/doctor confidentiality

Good point.

But also, if the point is to prevent rape, doesn't this device do what it does a little too late in the piece?

I don't think this woman is mad for trying to reduce the instances of rape, even in this extremely odd manner. It's gotta be better than nothing - consider instances when the guy is off his head drunk or on drugs... he may or may not be thinking clearly enough to check beforehand... I guarantee the pain will put an end to what he's doing.

Interesting post, Ahmed. Even if a little weird and scary... go find yourslef a punching bag and let loose. It might help!

;o)

Comment by Damo

March 23rd 2007 00:49
I'm not touching this one,
but I get the point.
ouch

Comment by Ahmed

March 23rd 2007 01:06
yoda76, it's just stupid, it's the dumbest thing I've ever read about coming from those feminists. It might work in a few instances but in most it will be worse than having nothing. I can just picture the angry rapist...

Comment by Nina

March 23rd 2007 04:26
I don't think it is fair to say that this woman hates all men - she hates men that are perpetrators of rape. I can see why she wanted to come up with this - after all, South Africa has one of the highest rates of rape in the world.

As everyone has said though, there are a hell of a lot of problems with it. One of the biggest issues I see will be that a man injured by this will certainly be in a lot of pain, but he is not going to be incapacitated. In fact, he is going to be really, really angry, and I think it will lead to a lot more injuries and even deaths of rape victims.



Comment by Ahmed

March 23rd 2007 04:33
Nina, I think he'll look before going in, which will mean he won't be getting angry form pain, just angry from what was going to happen.

Also I think it's fair to say, given her one supporter (read: one) implies her stupid feministic ideals with her "Why don't we all strap little shock devices onto men - wouldn't that help? But could you imagine the outcry?"


Comment by ephemeron

March 23rd 2007 05:16
Wow. Just Wow. After reading this I had to double check the calendar for a second to make sure I was still in the 21st century.

*phew*

Comment by Ahmed

March 23rd 2007 05:21
You know we could still be in the 15th century for all anyone knows. Time is all relative and has nothing to do with politics and culture, never has, never will.

Comment by Fingertip Titans Unite

March 23rd 2007 05:54
And truly we ARE still in the 15th century, and also in the 25th, as all time is actually NOW, and not the linear measurement we have been dillusioned to believe.

{Insert spoonbending music here}

Comment by Lilla

March 24th 2007 10:01
Ahmed,

I like it and I think it is a great idea for any woman, or man, who lives in a state of threat. I agree that I do not think this woman is a feminist, simply for inventing this thing, nor a man hater... I do think she looks like she may know what she's talking about when it comes to rape however?

Interesting post...

Lilla ...

Comment by Ahmed

March 24th 2007 12:37
Lilla, it just seems stupid, while it may nab one or two rapists soon enough it will be null and void as rapists start looking for it, it's that simple in the end.

Comment by Lilla

March 24th 2007 23:35
/seriously : if one rapist is caught and held responsible for his brutality, then it is a device that has been well worth the developing. My guess is, it will catch a few more than one, before something better (undetectable) comes along ...

Perhaps just the publicity and thought of it will be enough to deter a few?

I hope so...

Lilla ...


Comment by Ahmed

March 24th 2007 23:59
You're not thinking about the many more who would probably be murdered, not just raped, for having such a defensive measure...

Comment by Jessicca

March 30th 2007 07:29
I sense a lot of flame from your throat Ahmed.

So much anger, from one woman's invention? Man I can see how offended you are, whether it's just you or you are representing majority men's thoughts?

Though it doesn't make much sense in some areas, but we do know that countries like Africa, is really a wild area. Even if you aren't stuck at the alley and just plainly walking on the road alone, not over dressed or under dressed, would have some chances being attacked.

This, is happening in this world actually, regardless of location.

But why the impulse of men who want to traspass and hurt another woman, just because they can't hold onto their lust?

I understand it is a two way problem. And if any woman who's raped was really under dressed and give out all the signals, it can be a good argument from both sides.

You mentioned about the law, each country has a different law. There isn't a unified law that withholds everything. Probably in truly desperate situation this woman is trying to help (as it may most probably seemed) innocent victims in Africa. It could be a violation of human rights, but can you think of a better solution to help, rather than to barge out and point fingers on the accused or victim?

Just my thoughts.

Comment by Ahmed

March 30th 2007 07:54
Yes. as a matter of fact I can.

They can bring some law and order to those parts of the countries.

This device isn't going to stop rapes, it's only going to make them worse, one or two people might get caught but by and large rapists aren't idiots and neither are women who'll know better than to have one of those things.

Desperate as it may be (and thats questionable as it stands) that isn't a solution to the problem at all, it isn't going to stop rapists and it isn't going to protect women from anyone.

Comment by yoda76

March 31st 2007 02:03
I understand it is a two way problem. And if any woman who's raped was really under dressed and give out all the signals, it can be a good argument from both sides.

I'm sorry Jessiccca, but that's absolute rubbish.

There is no argument for rape that holds water. Certainly not the amount of clothing being worn - I've heard that a million times, and it ticks me off every time. No woman is "asking for it".

And if they were (and I mean literally, here, not by the way they dress) and then got unwelcome attention, then they are playing with fire...

I have come around somewhat to Ahmed's thinking on this, but I think it has little to do with feminism and man-bashing, and more a misguided idea with good intentions.

Comment by Philip Sharp

May 8th 2007 00:33
Accountability:

If you're going to whip out the big guns with that R-word -- use it properly. Sleeping with a man after a few beers and lamenting it later isn't rape -- it's regret. Telling a man "no" yet still being victimized perhaps due to violent/narcotic efforts, though, is rape -- and is deplorable. No one dares defend that. It's as universally disagreeable as murder or monarchy.

Almost as deplorable, though, is lazily falling back onto a lot of pre-established and nigh-vulnerable discourse from which to blur such boundaries. The discourse is ingenious: refute it, and you, too, can be branded as a rapist. This, to me, isn't liberal enlightened thinking -- this is demagoguery.

I wonder if I could create a device which would specifically target female anatomy. I'm sure misogynists would have a field day with this, so I needn't even sartorially suggest a prototype. But I bet it would sell. No wonder I'm a bit of a misanthrope.

Sell -- perhaps the crux of the issue. It sounds like good business, and I think perhaps good business is rarely focused on the intelligentsia. It's generally aimed it reactionary, nugatory fucks with little control over visceral response.

I'm sure the device will put her children through college.

Oddly enough, I feel that in making such statements, I am under some serious obligation to repeat that I'm not siding with the criminals here. But, I can see where Ahmed's disdain comes from -- in fact, I would hope we all would.


Herein lies the danger of venturing to be counter-counter-culture.

I hazard the simple koan: how might we simply eliminate any rape-inclined tendencies from the human psyche, through meme and through education?




Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
4 Posts
6 Posts
1 Posts
494 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by jkund17
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]