Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Classmate VS XO-1

May 21st 2007 16:31
This is quite an interesting battle, on the one hand we have Intel with its Intel Celeron M powered Classmate pitted against the XO-1 which is powered by an AMD chip. In terms of raw numbers it seems like Intel's Classmae is the clear winner.


Classmate

Classmate PC
Customized mini chassis 245 x 196 x 44

CPU: Intel® Celeron M mobile processor (915GMS ICH6-M)
CPU clock speed 900 MHz (Zero L2 cache 400 MHz FSB)
800 x 480 7 inch diagonal LCD, LVDS Interface, LED B/L
256MB of DDR2 RAM
2GB NAND flash memory (connected via USB)
10/100M ethernet
Realtek WLAN 802.11b/g with antenna (connected via USB)
Intel GM915 integrated graphics chip (8MB shared memory)
Built in microphone
Built in stereo speakers
Stereo 2 channel audio, jacks for external stereo speakers and microphones, Line-out, and Mic-in
Integrated keyboard with hot keys
Cycle touch pad with left and right buttons
Customized Note Taker with wireless pen
TPM1.2 (Trusted Platform Module from Infineon Technologies)
Power source:
6-cell Li-ion battery with adapter – approximately 4 hours usage


XO-1 Specifications:

XO-1
CPU: 433 MHz AMD Geode LX-700 at 0.8 watt, with integrated graphics controller

1200×900 7.5" diagonal LCD (200 dpi) that uses 0.1 to 1.0 watts depending on mode. The two modes are:
Reflective (backlight off) monochrome mode for low-power use in sunlight. This mode provides very sharp images for high-quality text.
Backlighted color mode, with an effective resolution that is asymmetrically reduced in complicated ways. See below for details.
256 MiB of Dual (DDR266) 133 MHz DRAM (in 2006 the specification called for only 128 MiB of RAM[25])
1024 KiB (1 MiB) flash ROM with open-source LinuxBIOS and Open Firmware
1024 MB of SLC NAND flash memory (in 2006 the specifications called for only 512 MB of flash memory[26])
Internal SD card slot[27]
Wireless networking using an “Extended Range” 802.11b/g wireless chipset run at a low bitrate (2 Mbit/s) to minimize power consumption.
Marvell 8388 wireless chip, chosen due to its ability to autonomously forward packets in the mesh even if the CPU is powered off. An ARM processor is included.
Dual adjustable antennae for diversity reception.
Water-resistant membrane keyboard using a fairly conventional (QWERTY in the US International localization) layout. The multiplication and division symbols are included.
Dual five-key cursor-control pads; four directional keys plus Enter
Touchpad for mouse control and handwriting input
Built-in color camera, to the right of the display, VGA resolution (640×480)
Built-in stereo speakers
Built-in microphone
Audio based on the AC97 codec, with jacks for external stereo speakers and microphones, Line-out, and Mic-in
3 external USB 2.0 ports.
Power sources:
DC input, ±10–25 V
5-cell rechargeable NiMH battery pack, 22.8 watt-hour (82 kJ) capacity

54
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
4 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by peeker

May 21st 2007 16:53
Personally it seems like I would choose XO-1. It has bigger screen, better resolution, nice features (like water resistant keyboard) and such stuff. Looks better too (although a bit too toy-like).

Comment by Ahmed

May 21st 2007 16:59
actually the XO-1 has a lower resolution screen at 640*480, the Classmate has a widescreen display at 800*480, its essentially the XO-1's screen but wider.

Though you make a good point, it does look more robust (though also toy ike).

Whats really cool about it though is it has an optional charger, you physically pump it and it charges the battery. That little puppy is self sustaining.

Comment by peeker

May 21st 2007 17:10
Actually I think the XO-1 has a resolution of 1200*900, which is a lot better.

And that battery thing is just awesome.

//peeker

Comment by Ahmed

May 21st 2007 17:16
oh right, damn, where the hell did 640*480 come to my mind?

bleh, I'm so retarded, thats the built in camera's resolution.

Thought he screen is using a diagnol matrix which apparently makes the image go a little blury. Meh, you're right though, it does have a better resolution.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
522 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by jkund17
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]