Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
Small PC - Big Power
Sometimes I wonder why people buy expensive computers. I've brought it up many-a-times in the past, if cheap computers were made available (as new) they would sell bucket loads.

The new Wal-Mart PC costing less than $200 but being able to do the typical word editing/internet surfing has been a huge hit and the first batch has sold out. Why? Well trust someone to spin this against Microsoft but personally I think it’s all about price vs. feature ratio.


It features a 1.5ghz CPU, 80gig hard drive 512mb ram comes with a DVD burner, runs Linux and comes in a small box – I’m even starting to want it.

For years, well since ever, computers have been price fixed, as new components have come out they have been adopted and have driven up the prices despite people not making use of the extra power. Most people will find that a computer from five years ago can accomplish the same tasks as a computer that was built last week, at a much lower price.

There is of course the problem of out dated components. Even though something might be more than capable of handling most tasks the age of its pieces could be its downing factor. If incompatible with modern hardware peripherals (be it keyboards or modems) consumers would have to purchase newer systems that pack an extra brunt despite the lack of need for it.

Now what of the software side? Well Linux has always been free, Windows is another story. Will the success of this new computer push Microsoft to compete with Linux on a crazy, almost psychotic manner, as it has already overseas?


Well we can certainly hope so, and maybe we can hope for a future where expensive PCs are not shoved down peoples throats.
84
Vote
   


Classmate VS XO-1

May 21st 2007 16:31
This is quite an interesting battle, on the one hand we have Intel with its Intel Celeron M powered Classmate pitted against the XO-1 which is powered by an AMD chip. In terms of raw numbers it seems like Intel's Classmae is the clear winner.


Classmate

Classmate PC
Customized mini chassis 245 x 196 x 44
CPU: Intel® Celeron M mobile processor (915GMS ICH6-M)
CPU clock speed 900 MHz (Zero L2 cache 400 MHz FSB)
800 x 480 7 inch diagonal LCD, LVDS Interface, LED B/L
256MB of DDR2 RAM
2GB NAND flash memory (connected via USB)
10/100M ethernet
Realtek WLAN 802.11b/g with antenna (connected via USB)
Intel GM915 integrated graphics chip (8MB shared memory)
Built in microphone
Built in stereo speakers
Stereo 2 channel audio, jacks for external stereo speakers and microphones, Line-out, and Mic-in
Integrated keyboard with hot keys
Cycle touch pad with left and right buttons
Customized Note Taker with wireless pen
TPM1.2 (Trusted Platform Module from Infineon Technologies)
Power source:
6-cell Li-ion battery with adapter – approximately 4 hours usage


XO-1 Specifications:

XO-1
CPU: 433 MHz AMD Geode LX-700 at 0.8 watt, with integrated graphics controller
1200×900 7.5" diagonal LCD (200 dpi) that uses 0.1 to 1.0 watts depending on mode. The two modes are:
Reflective (backlight off) monochrome mode for low-power use in sunlight. This mode provides very sharp images for high-quality text.
Backlighted color mode, with an effective resolution that is asymmetrically reduced in complicated ways. See below for details.
256 MiB of Dual (DDR266) 133 MHz DRAM (in 2006 the specification called for only 128 MiB of RAM[25])
1024 KiB (1 MiB) flash ROM with open-source LinuxBIOS and Open Firmware
1024 MB of SLC NAND flash memory (in 2006 the specifications called for only 512 MB of flash memory[26])
Internal SD card slot[27]
Wireless networking using an “Extended Range” 802.11b/g wireless chipset run at a low bitrate (2 Mbit/s) to minimize power consumption.
Marvell 8388 wireless chip, chosen due to its ability to autonomously forward packets in the mesh even if the CPU is powered off. An ARM processor is included.
Dual adjustable antennae for diversity reception.
Water-resistant membrane keyboard using a fairly conventional (QWERTY in the US International localization) layout. The multiplication and division symbols are included.
Dual five-key cursor-control pads; four directional keys plus Enter
Touchpad for mouse control and handwriting input
Built-in color camera, to the right of the display, VGA resolution (640×480)
Built-in stereo speakers
Built-in microphone
Audio based on the AC97 codec, with jacks for external stereo speakers and microphones, Line-out, and Mic-in
3 external USB 2.0 ports.
Power sources:
DC input, ±10–25 V
5-cell rechargeable NiMH battery pack, 22.8 watt-hour (82 kJ) capacity

42
Vote
   


There are many myths surrounding the Apple vs. Microsoft war, trying to put Microsoft down, myths such as Macintosh running OSX being more stable than PCs running Windows or Microsoft copying Apple. Surprising how misguided these attacks are, but I guess we all need someone to hate.

Here are some popular myths about Apple, Microsoft and the General PC VS Macintosh debates that I will go through logically and let you make up your own mind on where you stand.


Microsoft Copied Apple by Adding a GUI to Their Operating System (Incomplete story)

I know many people like to yell out ‘Microsoft started copying Apple from the beginning with a GUI’, well there are two things wrong with this claim. First and foremost is that including a GUI with an operating system was the next required update for all commercial level operating systems and software as a whole. If someone created a program that used a GUI to work on a Macintosh would that person be copying Apple?

Secondly, more importantly, it is not telling the whole truth, which is that Steve Jobs, founder of Apple, went on a tour to Xerox PARC which had already created a prototype machine with a GUI and was ‘inspired’ to do the same.

That’s the founding myth all ‘Microsoft copies Apple’ claims find their origin in.


Microsoft Copied Features From Apple’s OSX and Included Them in Vista (blatantly false)

Well this is nothing short of a joke, I’d say Apple copied Microsoft with OSX. From an extremely early Alpha preview of Vista (then codenamed Longhorn) shows features that had not even been announced for OSX.

Microsoft did go public with many features they were planning on putting into Vista way before Apple said anything of ‘similar’ features in OSX, there’s more evidence to suggest Apple copied Microsoft than vice versa. The only way Microsoft could have copied OSX with Vista would be if Microsoft had spy’s working inside Apple computers who found out about the features OSX was getting and subsequently reported back to HQ.

What is more likely is that Apple saw Microsoft showing off prototypes of features in Vista and quickly created similar software and rushed it to market before Microsoft released Vista, the trade off here is that some features Apple likes to claim Microsoft stole from them is underdeveloped. Example? Apples much hyped dashboard that came out first in Mac OSX 10.4 was already in early builds of Windows Vista in the form of the side bar. Whichever way you choose to look at it Microsoft, not Apple, showed off the concept of a side bar/dashboard first.


Intel Based Mac’s are ‘Optimised’ to squeeze more out of Dual Core Intel CPUs (blatantly false)

Lets take a fair look at both, some folks managed to crack the x86 OSX build intended for Intel based Macintosh computers so that it would run on a regular PC. As such we can (unfortunately for Apple) be able to have a direct comparison between Macs with OSX and Windows with OSX, fair game, the only thing we can say is perhaps the OSX running on Windows will have a few disadvantages running on hardware it is not ‘optimised’ for.

Well guess what? OSX, the Apple created operating system, runs faster on a $300 PC than ‘most mac minis’ (you’ll need to scroll down to the benchmarks), you can compare the score Mac Mini’s get to the 44.44 the PC got. So much for optimised.


OSX is More Stable Than Windows (partially true)

I honestly wouldn’t be surprised the so-called ‘stability’ of Macintosh computers thus far have not come from any advanced engineering on Apples behalf but a purposeful throttling of hardware on Apple computers simply so they run more stable. The question here is, do you want to pay premium on a computer that will run at 90% capacity so that it won’t theoretically crash once a week? How often have PC’s crashed on you and what were you doing when they did? Where you doig something you could do on a Macintosh?

From my own experience my PC crashes on me sporadically when I am pushing it hard.

For instance while playing some kinds of games I sometimes alt-tab between that and other programs. This doesn’t happen with all games, so far only a very few number of games do this to me very rarely, Elders Scrolls Oblivion is the most likely to crash while I play it in a window, other games such as Prey, Quake 4 or Half-Life 2 run smooth as butter whatever *else* I might be doing.

Please keep in mind as of writing the most technologically advanced game on Macs is ‘Prey’, which is, even if I do say so myself, nothing compared to Elders Scrolls Oblivion.

Other things I do is run DreamWeaver, Photoshop and fireworks simultaneously while Nero Vision is busily converting video files to burn onto a DVD. Not saying this to brag, some people do more, but I’m simply saying I can do all that without fear my operating system will crash on me.

Sure it crashes, but so what? I’m sure if you subject a Macintosh to do several things simultaneously it would crash too.

The debate about which is more stable is actually one that is subject to opinion, I don’t know who came up with the idea and I’m sure there is some credibility to the claims of the millions. We cannot prove one way or the other through an error free trial, software wise you cannot put a Macintosh through the same rigors as a PC.

If the claim is true I’d hazard to guess it is because Apple has put some form of throttling upon the hardware to ease up hardware strain, it seems to be the only plausible theory for the inconsistent benchmarks in osx86 Mac vs. PC.


Mac OSX is ‘more secure’ than Windows Vista (partially true)

The only reason for this is the low user base of OSX users compared to Windows users, not many are interested in breaking through Mac OSX’ security. Virus writers and hackers can and will break down any and all security measures you create, the trick is to keep up which Microsoft strives to do, not that it succeeds all the time. However in saying that I can safely say that using a free third party firewalls I have yet to be hacked or a virus is yet to be downloaded onto my PC.

If I wanted a virus to run on my PC I’d go to stupid sites advertising free porn and illegal software downloads. Mac users don’t because OSX hardly supports the illegal software and they are too busy masturbating over their hawt Macs. Windows users on the other hand need porn because PCs look butt ugly and they all are dirty pirates (just joking ^_^).


*Further Reading: 'Is Apple copying Microsoft?'


In Conclusion (Please don't flame me, hear me out… first)

Throughout this article the reader may assume I am going on an anti-Apple rampage, I’d just like to say that I’m not, I am not a Microsoft fanboy nor am I payed by Microsoft or compensated in anyway (no really, I mean it). I have plenty of criticism for Vista and by many I mean heaps and heaps, heck, I’m actually very convinced at this point in time I’ll be purchasing a Mac book next, not a PC and will not be buying Vista at all.

What I have been trying to do through this article is dispel some common myths that have been getting on my nerves.
44
Vote
   


Optimus Keyboard

December 20th 2006 08:24
Optimus Keyboard
The Optimus Keyboard (concept picture)
The Optimus keyboard looks amazing, it is the kind of thing geeks like me dream about. It is also one of those things that we know will be ridiculously expensive without much advantage over tried and true concepts.

Each individual key on the Optimus keyboard is a digital screen which displays an image, this image could be the letters of the alphabet or shortcut key’s for any individual software application


[ Click here to read more ]
65
Vote
   


Moderated by Ahmed
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]