huhhuh?
April 3rd 2007 11:29
I'm no fan of LGF, not only did they ruin Digg for a week with their crappy decade all repetitive 'lets bash Muslims' 'stories' that they forced by way of community Digg whoring but now after Digg members started burying their junk they have found the nerve to turn a new mentality, that all Digg members are idiots except them (most of them can't even use the 'reply' feature). Yet they still submit their junk to Digg and still try to make it to the front page on Digg through community Digg whoring.
To that end what they say is mostly stupid, very stupid, this has got to be the single dumbest comment any one from anywhere in the world could possibly make,
Link
While the question of guide dogs is something else entirely his comment of 'we don't go to their lands' is ignorant on several accounts, not the least of which is the people living on his 'land' probably are citizens of 'his' land.
Also it really isn't so 'huhhuh', I'd just like to point out we do go to 'their lands' and 'force our agendas' onto them, from Vietnam to Afghanistan (both Soviet era and modern times) to Iraq, 'we' really have a habit of going to 'their lands' and forcing 'our agendas' onto 'them', don't 'we'?
To that end what they say is mostly stupid, very stupid, this has got to be the single dumbest comment any one from anywhere in the world could possibly make,
If they don't want our dogs, don't come to our countries. We don't go to their lands and spread our agenda now do we... huhhuh? do we?
Link
While the question of guide dogs is something else entirely his comment of 'we don't go to their lands' is ignorant on several accounts, not the least of which is the people living on his 'land' probably are citizens of 'his' land.
Also it really isn't so 'huhhuh', I'd just like to point out we do go to 'their lands' and 'force our agendas' onto them, from Vietnam to Afghanistan (both Soviet era and modern times) to Iraq, 'we' really have a habit of going to 'their lands' and forcing 'our agendas' onto 'them', don't 'we'?
| 54 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
subscribe to this blog
Comment by yoda76
The Tube Blog
Ahmed - and I'm gonna sound like a complete blog newbie here - but I've never quite understood what digg does, or exactly how it works?
Comment by Ahmed
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Basically, you submit a link to it, say a link to an article on your blog (fairly straight forward) and it gets put on a really, really long list of other submitted articles. If enough people 'Digg' it in an allotted amount of time the story is put on the frontpage where it gets heaps of exposure.
I made it to the front page once... for about an hour I think being buried off it, I made 5000 hits during that time.
I made it again to the frontpage a couple of days later (got really, really lucky) and I made 20,000 hits for that day.
Just depends on the content, it always depends on the content.
Comment by yoda76
The Tube Blog
Comment by Ahmed
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
I swear 70% of them probably don't even know what Digg is even in the slightest, one of them even mentioned how he had no idea what it was and why it had suddenly started showing. If you see their comments you will also see how immature most of them are (my image of them is that they are a bunch of politically charged 13 year old rich kids).
So by getting together like that they push articles artifically to the frontpage, the system has corrected itself, now most Digg members just bury such articles (the opposite of digging).
Occasionally something gets through to the front page, I don't mind, I dislike how they ruined Digg for about a week but now things are better, they have their occasional frontpage stories and it's fair enough, it's all democracy.
They still take it on themselves to insult all Digg members when their stories don't make it to the frontpage, they think they are so special like that, like a 9 year old girl who wants a pony.