Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
Firefox Safari Internet Explorer
One argument against Microsoft based software is that they are less 'secure'. Now personally I don't understand the concept of software being less secure, if you're not doing anything stupid you probably won't have to deal with anything nasty.


Having said that I think it is becoming more and more obvious, if Microsoft’s software was ever less secure it was not because of poor software practices but rather the obscurity of its competitors. Unfortunately for the open source community they can no longer just talk as such software as Firefox becomes more and more mainstream.

Now after years of learning from mistakes Microsoft seems to have created a fairly solid package, there is yet to be a major security breach for any of Microsoft’s newer software and all the while the security holes in competing software such as Firefox and Safari to Microsoft's Internet Explorer keep adding and adding.

Many people are switching from Internet Explorer to alternative browsers such as Firefox and Safari. Though that might make them feel more secure, the shift has also opened new doors for bad guys.

Case in point: We have no IE bugs to report this month, but both Firefox and Safari have been hit hard.

Hackers Focus Efforts on Firefox, Safari


Something tells me lots of hobbyist Firefox/Safari fanboy hackers are going to go hard after Internet Explorer to even things up before the month is out. But we'll see.
58
Vote
   


Earlier on I elaborated on what I believed was a conspiracy against Microsoft through a veil known as 'The EU'. I retract that prior statement, or at least a part of it, the open source community seems to have nothing to do with this conspiracy because now, suddenly, out of no where, the EU says the open source community should pay Microsoft for alleged software patents the software giant is holding.

The natural question is, WHAT THE HELL? What software patents? They are so vague you'd have to have the imagination of Shayamalan to pull off a ripper of a twist that would even vaguely apply to any individual alleged infringment.

Reuters reported that "Commercial developers such as IBM or Red Hat must pay a license fee of 0.4 percent of revenues to Microsoft when they redistribute that software, to protect against patent challenges."

Commissioner Kroes has said, of the deal, "That percentage royalty has become a nominal, one-off payment of Euro 10,000. This is all that has to be paid by companies that dispute the validity or relevance of Microsoft's patents

Source
31
Vote
   


It Just Works, Doesn't It?

October 15th 2007 00:51
If this was Microsoft they would have been torn apart by now, those SOBs get torn apart for some crazy bugs no one cares about yet Apple has been screwing over some of its customers quite sometime with a piece of software that doesn't work, where are the complaints?

Bootcamp on certain 24" iMacs (ones with outdated nVidia 7300/7600 videocards) doesn't work, in fact it hasn't been working since the launch of the iMac last year! Get this, Apple has been screwing over its customers with a buggy piece of crap software for the past year and no one has complained about it until now via this typical Apple fanboy blog post (typical in the sense it gives no sources and says it's a secret) showing off just how 'content' iMac users are.

I wouldn't tolerate it of Microsoft if my system didn't support software it should, heck, I can barely tolerate the fact that some games from the Windows 98 days don't run on Vista. But you know, Bootcamp is unimportant, the very reason those damned IntelMacs exist is just an extra thrown in. It's only a 'beta' version of the software which magically exempts it from working for about a full year.

This just goes without saying, too many Mac owners are too busy justifying their purchase that they don't dare complain about their faulty products. No one who uses a Windows machine would be that forgiving of Microsoft and rightly so, about time Apple fanboys got with the program and stopped allowing Apple from pushing them around. Theres no pride in owning a Mac, especially if one of its key features is stuffed.

You know what? Let me highlight the fact, look at the comments section,

You don't know what you've got till it's gone. Those white iMacs were actually quite a bit better than the current ones which have a glare-plagued screen and weak graphics. Come back, come back!

Well Wait for the xMac announcement in November.

Anyone know if the current iMacs have MXM slots either.

The name of the update strikes me as odd simply because Apple has never admitted to using the MXM card slot AFAIK.

It may be a MXM slot but you need a EFI rom on the video card for it to work.

I was wondering the same thing. Anyone know if an upgrade is possible? Maybe 8600GT 512MB DDR2 from MXM based notebooks.

So the first five posts is not about the fact Apple has not repaired a fatal software problem since almost about a year ago, it's either about how bad the new iMacs are (i.e. buy the old crappy one that doesn't actually run Bootcamp!), how we should wait for another rumoured announcement for another piece of crap that will probably have plaguing issues of its own, and the next three is all about 'awww, I wanna upgrade my Mac' to which I have the simple response of YOU CAN'T!

Naturally after all that crud theres something about how bad Apples behaviour has been

That's really poor that it's taken over a year to resolve that kind of issue and yet again graphics card related. They seriously need to think about hiring people who know what the hell they're doing when it comes to graphics. Carmack from id said they had to inform Apple's team about graphics-related problems in their software and there's been quite a few driver problems lately.

Does this go on? Nope, back to 'I wanna upgrade my shiny computer... oooh pretty liiiights!'

ati and nvidia used to code there own mac drivers maybe they should restart that and come out with video cards with efi roms for mac systems.

Now for a strange phenomenon, a Mac user actually complaining about his systems obvious failings,

I upgraded to the new iMac 24" aluminum just to run Boot Camp beta, and to my surprise I'm still having issues. While I can run Vista with good performance scores, I can't get the drivers to go up to full 1900x1200 resolution (max in Vista is something like 1900x1080!). I've tried everything, including installing ATI's Catalyst drivers; I'm assuming this will be fixed with Leopard. Rather, I'm hoping.

Naturally to wrap it up we have more 'I wanna have nice graphix cards like teh evil Micro$oft users!!1!!1!'

This was why I asked about MXM in Alu iMacs. If Apple is using MXM in all iMacs (and they could use them in MBP / Mac Minis in the future) then pretty soon there would be enough people with the slot and EFI to justify a third party card.

They use custem heat pipes and Heat sinks.

So what was the title of the article in question? "Apple's iMac MXM Updater to cure iMac's Boot Camp woes". It would seem Apple prides itself on having an idiot customer base.
41
Vote
   


No Thinly Veiled Bias Here

October 5th 2007 03:41
None whatsoever, it's so blatant one can't help but wonder how the hell APC can be taken seriously considering some of its articles. Angus Kidman and his fantasticly ambiguous question 'Can IE's architect explain why it's so bloated?' is of particular note, which he kicks off by completely blowing his credibility:

My attempts to interview Chris Wilson, Microsoft's platform architect for Internet Explorer, appear threatened by technical difficulties even before the discussion begins. His temporary-conference-visitor speaker phone in Sydney won't work, then my computer crashes just before the interview starts, which in the sub-planet of Vista I'm forced to inhabit means a ten-minute reboot time.

[ Click here to read more ]
54
Vote
   


Microsoft Anti Competitive Behaviour
Microsoft has always been the best friend of the programmer, in fact when compared to the likes of Apple or IBM it looks like they're in another entire business altogether. Just what has gotten into the minds of the morons up in the EU who seem to beconvinced of Microsoft’s dastardly plans like some moronic Linux fanboy?

What’s even more disgusting is the fact the EU is charing Microsoft with the same behaviours companies like Apple make an actual business model out of. Microsoft is being asked to reveal its 'secrets' to allow third party developers to better compete with them on their own OS


[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
   


Firefox is Proof Open Source is Failing

September 16th 2007 09:12
The general consensus is that the open source isn't gaining traction is because Microsoft is doing what it needs to from a business standpoint to buy out/take hostage the consumer. However the massive popularity of Firefox is proof enough that this simply can't be the case.

When it comes down to it all you just have to look at it in perspective. Every Windows machine ships with a copy of Internet Explorer for free, yet consumers are actively finding and download Firefox. What of Word Processing software? People pay money for Microsoft Office, and it sure isn't cheap, it doesn't even necessarily come with every Windows PC and additional components will invariably cost more (such as Excel, PowerPoint, etc


[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
   


I find it strange how Microsoft’s bid to create a new standard for document formats is causing the Open Source community to respond with empty claims and false accusations. It sure isn’t that different to how Microsoft was acting not too long ago in regards to supposed Linux patent violations.

So what is OOXML? For the uninitiated it is a set of standards set up by Microsoft to allow documents to be portable across the board of software. It’s nothing new, even Open Office has had its document type standardized by the ISO
[ Click here to read more ]
31
Vote
   


How Easy a Mac is

February 8th 2007 10:10
So I read in the February issue of ‘Macworld’ of yet another one of those ‘from PC to Macintosh’ migrants. Jason Snell (editor) speaks of how his retired ex-executive uncle decided to move over to Mac claiming that the reason he wouldn’t move of past was because that Windows based software would not run on Mac’s and since the Mac’s switch to Intel CPU’s it has become more efficient to run Windows applications natively on OSX.

But why would his uncle move to Mac? Apparently because OSX is so much ‘easier’ to work with than Windows. The Mac Fanboys really, really, need to get their heads out of the sand if they really want to move on and properly challenge Microsoft’s dominance, there ‘once upon a time, happily ever after’ stories just doesn’t cut it, ignoring the facts does not make everything better


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


There are many myths surrounding the Apple vs. Microsoft war, trying to put Microsoft down, myths such as Macintosh running OSX being more stable than PCs running Windows or Microsoft copying Apple. Surprising how misguided these attacks are, but I guess we all need someone to hate.

Here are some popular myths about Apple, Microsoft and the General PC VS Macintosh debates that I will go through logically and let you make up your own mind on where you stand


[ Click here to read more ]
38
Vote
   


Super Hawt, Super Wrought

January 21st 2007 15:01
Not surprisingly photoshopping and fancy lighting effects are what is responsible for all the beauty in the world. I don't think it would take a genius to figure that any of these... things... are particularly ‘beautiful’ in real life, at least not out in the skin and judged by their own set standards.


[ Click here to read more ]
61
Vote
   


Face Manipulation

January 19th 2007 08:28
This new ‘technology’ runs purely on software so you won’t need any fancy pansy hardware to get it working other than a computer that can handle it.

Simply put it creates a face in 3D from a photograph and a reference model


[ Click here to read more ]
38
Vote
   


Open XML Trap, From Microsoft With Love

January 17th 2007 20:18
Clearly Microsoft is trying to get under the skin of open source then deviously tear it apart from the inside.

OOXML open XML logo
OOXML
Open XML (OOXML) is a list of specifications for the file format of several document types such as memos, spreadsheets, documents amongst others, it is to be used in Microsoft Office 2007. Microsoft has also gained approval from Ecma to make OOXML an open standard
[ Click here to read more ]
40
Vote
   


If you can’t beat them…

November 4th 2006 08:20
Pretend you join them and tear them limb for limb from the inside. You might think that is cruel, harsh, diabolically evil, but when you know Microsoft is in the picture you know only one word can pretty much describe it all: “Typical”.

MS TUX
That'll be the day
Microsoft has for years been trying to destroy open source community via calculated law suits, generally speaking it has had wins and losses for Microsoft legally, but nothing but loss in terms of public relations. One of the main reasons many claim Microsoft is evil is the fact it goes after unpaid programmers who produce software that may or may not even (in some cases) infringe on Microsoft’s patents


[ Click here to read more ]
69
Vote
   


If there was ever a time to change banks this would be it. Westpac is poised to ‘upgrade’ 20,000 PC’s to Microsoft’s new operating system “Windows Vista” by December.

Westpac enterprise services chief information Officer David Backley is apparently unconcerned to be jumping straight into Microsoft’s to-be-released operating system. He reasons he would it’s better to upgrade instead of ‘wait for problems to appear with the current support environment


[ Click here to read more ]
59
Vote
   


Moderated by Ahmed
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]